The latest data from the EPO Technology Dashboard 2025 report brings a bittersweet picture of the Polish innovation ecosystem. Although the number of patent applications to the European Patent Office (EPO) fell by 10.3% year-on-year, Polish inventors shifted their focus towards high value-added sectors such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. With 621 applications, Poland maintains its 12th position in the European Union, remaining the undisputed innovation leader in the CEE region.
Turning from quantity to strategic quality
The decline in dynamics after a period of intense growth lasting from 2021 can be interpreted as a market correction, but the long-term outlook remains optimistic. Compared to 2016, the number of Polish applications increased by 58%, twice the average dynamics of the EPO as a whole (27%).
What is most interesting about this year’s list is the changing of the guard in key sectors. The previous leader, medical technology, gave way to pharma, which recorded a spectacular 51.7% year-on-year growth. Strong growth was also recorded in transport and automotive, as well as machinery and energy, which directly correlates with the global race for renewables and battery technology.
Academic innovation engine
A peculiarity of the Polish market, which distinguishes it from Western economies, is the dominant role of the public sector and science. While globally the EPO rankings are dominated by technology giants, in Poland half of the leading applicants are universities and research institutes. Jagiellonian University, the Medical University of Gdansk and the University of Warsaw remain the main drivers of domestic intellectual property.
From a business perspective, this raises the question of the effectiveness of technology transfer from the walls of academia to industry. However, the record interest in the Single European Patent** suggests that Polish innovators are thinking broadly about commercialisation. As many as 59.6% of patents granted to Poles were granted unitary status, which is significantly higher than the EU average (40.7%) and facilitates expansion into the markets of 18 EU countries.
Human capital and regional bastions
Poland also stands out from Europe in terms of inclusiveness. Every third patent application from the Vistula (35%) mentions a woman as a co-inventor. This result is well above the European average (26%), giving Poland 5th place in the entire EPO.
Geographically, the innovation map remains stable, although there are signs of decentralisation. Warsaw, despite a decline in the number of applications, controls more than a quarter of the market. Malopolska is strengthening behind it, and Lower Silesia is the only one of the leading regions to record an increase in activity (by 8.5%), confirming Wrocław’s status as a growing technology hub.
At a time of a global race in fields such as AI, 6G or quantum technologies, Poland’s breathlessness in 2025 may only be a stopgap before the next leap – if the research momentum of universities can be sustainably translated into market successes for companies.
“The record number of European patent applications underlines our continent’s innovation potential and its attractiveness as a global technology market,” said EPO President António Campinos. “The Technology Dashboard 2025 examines progress as well as gaps in specific industry sectors, helping decision makers in Europe to identify priority areas and guide actions and investments that strengthen technological sovereignty and competitiveness. While the European unitary patent is already removing barriers and accelerating the transition to a more integrated innovation market, the topic still deserves our attention, especially in strategic sectors such as artificial intelligence, semiconductors, health and quantum technologies,” adds the EPO President.
Today’s technological revolution has an epicentre, and that is undoubtedly artificial intelligence. It is not just another innovation; it is a fundamental force transforming the global economy, military strategy and social fabric.
In this new era, marked by an unprecedented pace of change, patents have become the equivalent of territorial claims during the gold rush era. They are a hard, measurable indicator of national strategy, innovative capacity and, most importantly, future economic power. Leadership in AI is seen as a prerequisite for competitiveness, security and prosperity in the 21st century, with the technology revolutionising every sector from healthcare to defence.
The global scene is dominated by two hegemons: The United States, with its capital power and dominance in the creation of fundamental models, and China, which is pursuing a monumental state-led strategy to achieve quantitative superiority. In this bipolar balance of power, a key question arises about Europe’s position. Is the Old Continent merely a distant third player, condemned to watch the giants compete from the sidelines? Or is it, contrary to common narratives, building its own unique path to technological sovereignty and competitiveness? Is Europe realistically catching up?
Drawing on hard data from the world’s leading intellectual property organisations – the European Patent Office (EPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) – and in-depth reports from leading research institutions such as the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI) and the OECD, this analysis aims to separate the facts from the media hype. We will trace the dynamics of patent applications, examine the quality and strategic focus of innovation, and place this data in a broader geopolitical context to provide a nuanced answer to the question of Europe’s future in the global AI race.
The global AI patent arena: a numbers game and exponential growth
An analysis of global patent trends in the field of artificial intelligence reveals a picture of unprecedented dynamism. The scale and pace of growth in this field eclipses previous innovation cycles, signalling a fundamental technological shift. In just over a decade, the world has witnessed an explosion of patent activity that has redefined the map of global innovation.
An unprecedented wave of innovation
The data is clear: the number of AI-related patents granted globally has increased more than 31-fold since 2010. In 2010, only 3,833 patents were granted worldwide in this field. By 2023, this number has risen to a staggering 122,511, an increase of 29.6% on the previous year alone. This exponential growth is testament to the intense and ever-accelerating investment in AI research and development worldwide.
The tri-polar balance of power
When we look at the geographical distribution of these patents, a clear three-layered landscape emerges, with different players operating at very different scales.
China’s quantitative supremacy: China is the undisputed leader in terms of volume, accounting for an overwhelming 69.7% of all AI patents granted worldwide in 2023. This share has increased dramatically over the past decade, cementing China’s position as the most prolific innovator in terms of number of applications. Already in 2022, China has been granted more AI patents (around 40,000) than the rest of the world combined, while the US, in second place, has been granted around 9,000….
Position of the US and Europe: the US ranks a distant second with a share of 14.16% in 2023, and Europe is third with a share of 13.00%. These figures clearly indicate that in terms of pure patent numbers, Europe is not only failing to catch up with the US, but both regions are dominated by the scale of Chinese activity.
The scale of China’s quantitative dominance is so massive that it suggests more than just organic, market-driven innovation growth. Historically, in globally competitive technology fields, such a rapid and massive accumulation of intellectual property in one country is unusual. The data confirms that this is the result of a deliberate national strategy, supported by massive government funding and top-down directives. This means that China’s patent statistics cannot be interpreted solely as a measure of commercial innovation in the Western sense. They are also an indicator of the implementation of a state industrial policy aimed at declaring a technological presence and building a powerful national IP portfolio. This fundamentally changes the context of the comparison – it is no longer just a race for the best ideas, but for China, also a race for sheer volume as a strategic goal.
The European innovation frontline: analysis of data from the EPO
Global statistics, while impressive, only tell part of the story. To reliably assess Europe’s competitiveness, it is necessary to transfer the analysis to its ‘own backyard’ – the European Patent Office (EPO). This is because the EPO data reflects the real battle for the lucrative and technologically advanced European market, and these shed a whole new light on the continent’s position.
AI as the new engine of European innovation
The EPO Patent Index 2024 report brings breaking news: for the first time ever, Computer Technology, a category that includes Artificial Intelligence, has become the leading technology field in terms of the number of patent applications at the EPO, reaching 16,815 applications. This proves that AI is at the heart of the most advanced R&D aimed at the European market.
The main drivers of this growth over the past five years have been inventions directly related to AI – such as machine learning, pattern recognition and neural networks. Applications in these subcategories have grown at an average annual rate of 28% since 2019. In 2024 alone, the number of AI-related applications at the EPO increased by 10.6% compared to the previous year, confirming the unrelenting momentum in this area.
European innovators leading their own market
Most importantly, the EPO data shows that in the key area of AI-related inventions, it is “applicants from EPO member states that have maintained a leading position throughout this period [of the last five years]”. Although in the broader category of ‘computer technology’, US entities lead the way (with a 34.4% share compared to 29.5% for EPO countries), in the narrower but strategically key area of AI, Europe is in the lead.
The growth in filings from EPO countries in computer technology was very solid at +5.9% in 2024, driven by significant innovation jumps from Germany (+12.7%), Switzerland (+37.4%) and the UK (+12.4%). This indicates the existence of a thriving and dynamic innovation ecosystem in Europe.
Analysis of the EPO data leads to an important conclusion. Filing a patent application, especially at an office as rigorous and expensive as the EPO, is a significant strategic investment. Companies do not take such steps without a firm belief in the commercial potential of their inventions. The high level of EPO filings from all regions – the US, Asia and Europe – is indicative of the widespread perception that the European market is a key and highly profitable one. The fact that it is European entities that lead the way in AI-specific filings at their own patent office suggests that they are not only conducting advanced research, but are strategically focused on protecting and commercialising these innovations in their home economic zone. Global statistics may reflect broad research activity and national strategies, but EPO data is a much better indicator of the real-world, commercial race for Europe. And in this race, Europe is not just a participant – it is a leader. This completely changes the ‘catching up’ narrative.
Quality vs. quantity: a deeper look at patent strategies
The number of patents alone is an imperfect measure of innovative power. To fully understand the global dynamics, it is necessary to introduce the dimensions of quality, impact and strategic purpose behind patent portfolios. An analysis of these factors reveals that the US, China and Europe are not in one, but in three separate races, each with different rules and objectives.
US strategy: fundamental models and high-impact intellectual property
The US has a clear focus on the quality and fundamental importance of its innovations. The best evidence of this is the citation rate – US AI patents are cited almost seven times more often than Chinese patents, indicating that they form the basis for later inventions around the world.
What’s more, the US absolutely dominates the creation of ‘notable AI models’ – systems that represent key technological breakthroughs. In 2024, US institutions have created 40 such models, compared to 15 by China and just three by Europe.
This leadership is driven by corporate giants such as Google, Microsoft and IBM, who are investing billions in basic research.
China strategy: Volume, applications and academic innovation
The Chinese strategy is based on massive scale. However, the quality of this portfolio is subject to debate; the grant ratio for AI patents in China is estimated at only 32%. Furthermore, the vast majority of these patents are filed only in the domestic market, suggesting a focus on the domestic market and the building of a defensive IP wall.
A key differentiator is the source of innovation. In China, as many as 65 of the top 100 patenting organisations in computer vision are universities. In the US, the number is only three. This shows a model driven by the state and the academic sector, in contrast to the US model, which is commercially oriented and dominated by the private sector.
The European model: Industrial integration and applied AI
Europe’s leading patent applicants reflect the continent’s industrial strength. Companies such as Siemens and Bosch from Germany are key players, focusing on the application of AI in industrial automation, manufacturing and transportation.
This suggests a strategy of integrating cutting-edge artificial intelligence into already established, highly developed sectors of the economy, rather than competing directly in the creation of foundational models.
The patent data shows not one race, but three parallel, strategically distinct endeavours. The US ecosystem, driven by massive private capital, seeks to create and own the foundational platforms – the ‘shovels and picks’ of the AI era – on which others will build their solutions. Its patent strategy is selective and geared towards maximum impact. China’s state-controlled ecosystem is focused on rapid and widespread adoption, technological self-sufficiency and achieving dominance in specific application areas such as computer vision. Its patent strategy is a game of volume and control of the domestic market. Finally, the European ecosystem is a mature industrial economy that is adapting AI to strengthen its existing competitive advantages. Its patent strategy focuses on protecting highly specialised, high-value applications in key sectors. The question of whether Europe is ‘catching up’ with the US is therefore like asking whether a Formula One team is ‘catching up’ with an aerospace company. Both are competing in engineering, but in completely different disciplines and with different objectives.
Behind the numbers: strategic and geopolitical context
Patent trends do not exist in a vacuum. They are a direct reflection of deeper national strategies, investment realities and structural conditions. Analysis of this context is crucial to understanding Europe’s true position in the global AI race.
Europe’s dilemma: A pioneer of regulation, a marauder of investment
The European Union has adopted a proactive, regulation-oriented approach, culminating in the AI Act. The aim is to establish a global standard for ‘trustworthy’ artificial intelligence as a showcase for the European model. However, this ambitious regulatory vision is accompanied by a massive investment gap. In 2024, private investment in AI in the US reached USD 109.1 billion. This is almost 12 times more than in China (USD 9.3 billion) and significantly more than in the European Union, where estimates suggest around USD 8 billion. European strategic initiatives such as the ‘AI Factories’ programme (with a budget of EUR 20 billion) or the ‘Apply AI Strategy’ (EUR 1 billion) attempt to respond to this challenge. However, their scale pales in comparison not only to total US private investment, but even to individual corporate projects such as OpenAI’s Stargate.
Infrastructure gap – Europe’s Achilles heel
Europe’s greatest structural weakness is its critical dependence on foreign technology infrastructure. It is estimated that around 70% of Europe’s digital services run on the clouds of three US giants (so-called hyperscalers). At the same time, the European semiconductor manufacturing sector accounts for less than 10% of global production, making the continent dependent on chips designed in the US and manufactured in Asia. This fundamental weakness poses a direct threat to the EU’s strategic goal of achieving ‘digital sovereignty’.p
The table below synthesises the key differences between the three ecosystems, providing a summary of the AI strategic landscape.
Indicator
Europe
USA
China
Private Investment in AI (2024)
approx. USD 8 billion
USD 109.1 billion
USD 9.3 billion
Regulatory Philosophy
Proactive, risk-based, horizontal (AI Act)
Reactive, free market, voluntary framework
State-controlled, information control, sectoral regulation
Potential risk of lack of regulation, concentration of power in the hands of a few companies
Quality issues and international recognition of patents, political barriers
What does the future hold for Europe in the AI race?
After an in-depth analysis of the patent data and the strategic context, the answer to the question of Europe’s position in the global AI race becomes clear, albeit multidimensional.
Firstly, in terms of pure patent numbers, Europe is not catching up and will probably never catch up with China. The scale of Beijing’s state strategy makes volume an inadequate and misleading measure of success for Europe.
Secondly, Europe is significantly behind the US in developing fundamental models and raising venture capital. The financial strength and risk appetite of the US ecosystem are currently out of reach.
However, the key conclusion of this analysis is that Europe’s success should not be measured by its ability to copy American or Chinese models. On the contrary, its future lies in the skilful exploitation of its unique strengths. Europe is not a marauder, but a leader in the race for high-value, industrial and applied artificial intelligence. Its strength lies in the deep integration of AI into the world-class manufacturing, automotive, medical and green technology sectors. Data from the European Patent Office clearly confirms that in its own core market, Europe is winning the innovation race.
The future competitiveness of the continent will depend on two critical factors:
Bridging the infrastructure and investment gap: The success of initiatives such as AI Factories is absolutely crucial. Without sovereign computing power and a stronger venture capital ecosystem, Europe will always build its innovative applications on foundations owned by foreign powers.
Strategic use of regulation: Europe must effectively present its AI Act not as a barrier to innovation, but as a global competitive advantage. The aim is to create a premium market for ‘trustworthy’, secure and human-centred AI systems, which will increasingly be demanded by corporate customers and citizens around the world.
Europe may not win the sprint for the number of patents, but it is perfectly placed to compete in the marathon for sustainable, valuable and trustworthy integration of AI into the real economy. The race is far from over, and Europe is running its own distinct and well-considered path in it.
Zarządzaj swoją prywatnością
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Funkcjonalne
Always active
Przechowywanie lub dostęp do danych technicznych jest ściśle konieczny do uzasadnionego celu umożliwienia korzystania z konkretnej usługi wyraźnie żądanej przez subskrybenta lub użytkownika, lub wyłącznie w celu przeprowadzenia transmisji komunikatu przez sieć łączności elektronicznej.
Preferencje
Przechowywanie lub dostęp techniczny jest niezbędny do uzasadnionego celu przechowywania preferencji, o które nie prosi subskrybent lub użytkownik.
Statystyka
Przechowywanie techniczne lub dostęp, który jest używany wyłącznie do celów statystycznych.Przechowywanie techniczne lub dostęp, który jest używany wyłącznie do anonimowych celów statystycznych. Bez wezwania do sądu, dobrowolnego podporządkowania się dostawcy usług internetowych lub dodatkowych zapisów od strony trzeciej, informacje przechowywane lub pobierane wyłącznie w tym celu zwykle nie mogą być wykorzystywane do identyfikacji użytkownika.
Marketing
Przechowywanie lub dostęp techniczny jest wymagany do tworzenia profili użytkowników w celu wysyłania reklam lub śledzenia użytkownika na stronie internetowej lub na kilku stronach internetowych w podobnych celach marketingowych.
